A Circular Polarized Quad Patch Array for the 900 MHz ISM BandDriving a patch array antenna is a tricky and multidisciplinary affair - a combination of electrics, magnetics and mechanics - where theory meets reality. Patch antennas are useful between about 1 and 5 GHz. Below that, they are too big and above that, too small to be practical for the manufacturing tolerances of a hobbyist. For L, S and C-band, a radio amateur can use patches with good effect, using not much more than tin snips and a nibble tool.
902-928 MHz ISM Band LCP Quad Patch Antenna
The patch antenna theory can be explored with a simulation program such as NEC2: https://www.aeronetworks.ca/2018/07/patch-antenna-design-with-nec2.html
You could make an array with any number of patches, but more than four would be a whole lot of hassle. A SAR radar antenna may have 300 tiny little patches. However, a two by two is about the limit of my patience.
Any piece of metal within half a wavelength of an antenna, becomes part of the antenna and an array antenna is the sum of its parts. If you want to construct a phased array with circular polarization, then it is even more true.
To work with microwave antennas, you must have a fairly decent two port vector network analyzer (A KC901V costs only about $2500 on Aliexpress). The Q of a microwave antenna is very high and reality will always differ from the design by a few percent. Therefore, your design will have to be tuned and tweaked to get it right, since the overall bandwidth is only a few percent.
A patch antenna is a ridiculously sensitive thing. You have to mount it very securely with nylon standoffs and use good quality connectors and cables, otherwise your results will not be repeatable.
Let me say that again:
A patch antenna is a ridiculously sensitive thing. You have to mount it very securely with nylon standoffs and use good quality connectors and cables, otherwise your results will not be repeatable.
If you assemble a rough test patch and measure it, then quickly take it apart and put it back together without changing anything and measure it again, the centre frequency can be several MHz different - it can shift by more than the bandwidth of the patch antenna for no apparent reason. Therefore, tuning a patch antenna requires a lot of patience and you got to assemble it with care: Nuts, bolts, connectors - the whole nine yards. Otherwise you will waste your own time.
I have looked at many different patch array antennas and came to the conclusion that all of them are too complex to my liking and that there is room to simplify the design of the patch layout and the drive circuitry, to make one that is more easily tunable and manufacturable.
Impedance matching of a single patch is relatively easy. At the edge it is 100 to 200 Ohm and at the centre zero Ohm. In between those, you can get 50 or 75 Ohm for a coaxial cable drive, or you can work directly with the measured impedance on the edge, if fed with a microstripline.
I probe it for a 50 Ohm spot by drilling a few little holes 25 to 35% from the edge and pick the best one for a coaxial cable to a VNA and then, once tuned up, measure the edge impedance for a microstripline feed. With a little experience and luck, the very first hole can be spot on.
A probe (pin) feed is fine if the patch is not ridiculously thick, with h < 3% of the wavelength.
FR4 Patch Test Antenna
Microstriplines and patches can be designed with the Pasternack or Microwaves 101 calculators, which will provide a good starting point for your new tin snipping hobby: https://www.microwaves101.com/calculators/1201-microstrip-calculator
In a single patch antenna, one can achieve circular polaration either by phasing the drive signal (by driving two sides with a 90 degree phase shift), or by perturbing the dimensions (to cause a current and field shift). In this case, the phasing approach tends to yield better circular polarization - the mechanical trimming result is more elliptical.
Similarly, an array can achieve circular polarization by using multiple circular polarized elements, or by rotating and phasing the drive of the elements. Again, the rotating and phasing approach is more circular and the other more elliptical.
Another problem with a patch antenna is that it is a very narrow band device. If you tune a patch to 915 MHz (The centre of the ISM band), it may have a VSWR at that frequency of 1.2, but at the edges of the band, it may be 2 or 3, which is not so good. The bandwidth of the patch can be increased by increasing the height above the ground plane (decreasing the capacitance), but that will reduce the centre frequency also, so you need to trim it slightly smaller. The maximum usable height is about 3 to 5% of the wavelength.
Return Loss Plot of a Test Antenna
To get the phasing of the patches right, you need to use different length transmission lines. With 4 patches, a successive shift of 90 degrees is required, which, if done with a single piece of line, will act like a quarter wave transformer, which may be an unwanted side effect. Also, the length of the line is dependent on the frequency, so the phasing circuit will make the antenna even more frequency sensitive.
One way to increase the bandwidth of the array, is to tune each patch to a slightly different frequency (by changing the spacing with little nylon washers). Intuitively, you can think of a Yagi or Log Periodic array, where each piece of wire is tuned differently, yet all the elements work together as one. The same thing happens in a patch array with slightly differently tuned elements - the overall bandwidth of the array then opens up.
Therefore, instead of designing all four patches for exactly 915 MHz, one could tune them to 912, 914, 916 and 918 MHz, or 910, 913, 916 and 919 MHz and achieve better performance over the whole 902 to 928 MHz ISM band.
Alternatively, one could cut a notch in the left and right sides of a patch, which could increase the bandwidth from 3 % to about 10 % while still keeping it linear polarized, but cutting the notches will reduce the centre frequency a little bit and you may have to adjust the height by 1 mm to compensate. Choices, choices...
The patch feeds need to be divided/combined into one drive signal. It can be done with a succession of Wilkenson dividers, but when you also need to create a phase shift and an impedance match for each patch, it becomes a rather complex and narrow band affair.
Unified Phasing, Power and Impedance Matching
When you need to do power dividing/combining, you also need to match to different impedances. Two impedances can be matched with a quarter wave transformer, but that is a narrow band device. A more broadband match can be achieved with three transformers in series.
If you squint at a series of quarter wave transformers, they resemble a tapered line and it was found that a tapered line of one or more quarter wavelengths, does indeed provide impedance matching with a significantly broader bandwidth than discrete 1/4 wave transformers.
The ultimate is the Klopfenstein Taper: https://www.microwaves101.com/encyclopedias/klopfenstein-taper However, a longer linear taper works just as well in practice.
This leads to the following conclusion for a circular polarized array:
- Place the 4 patches 1 to 1.25 effective wavelength (in air) apart (centre to centre).
- To combine 4 transmission lines and get a 50 Ohm drive impedance, each line should be 200 Ohm (like 4 resistors in parallel) at the coaxial connector, OR
- Make an H circuit and convert 50 Ohm to 100 Ohm to 50 Ohm using 6 striplines.
- On the patch side, the transmission line should match to the patch impedance.
- The first line is however long it needs to be and an odd multiple of 1/8th wavelength overall - to avoid making a 1/4 wave transformer.
- To get a succession of phase shifts, each transmission line should be 1/4 wave longer than the previous.
- Each patch should be rotated by 90 degrees, compared to the previous.
- To improve the bandwidth, use long tapered lines and avoid the inadvertent creation of 1/4 wave transformers.
- To reduce spurious transmissions from the microstriplines, do not make sharp corners. Rather make 45 degree corners, or smooth S lines.
Simple Array Drive Solution
As O'l Albert Einstein said:
A thing should be as simple as possible, but no simpler.
The final drive result is a simple four legged cross of microstriplines, each leg of the spider longer than the previous by a quarter wavelength (At the specific de-tuned patch frequency).
Quad Patch Layout
Tweaking and Tinkering
A low cost patch array antenna can be built from FR4 PCB. At 1 GHz, the permittivity of this board is about 4.3. To tweak your design, make a 50 Ohm strip, 3 mm wide and 5/8th wavelength long. Solder two 1/8th Watt 100 Ohm resistors in parallel over the far end to terminate it and measure it with a VNA. (Putting two resistors in parallel, reduces their inductance by half). This way you can get a fudge factor for the permittivity, track width and wave length to tweak your designs with.
You can experiment with microstriplines and patch antennas using copper tape on single sided PCB and a (new!) pair of sharp scissors: https://www.digikey.com/en/product-highlight/3/3m/copper-foil-tape-1181 or from my favourite high tech electronics store: https://www.sparkfun.com/products/13828
You will also need a large variety of nylon bolts, nuts and spacers for tuning purposes. Digikey has a good selection: https://www.digikey.com/en/product-highlight/r/raf/nylon-spacers-and-standoffs.
This assumes that your VNA is tuned!
To tune a VNA, buy a decent quality ready made short coaxial cable from Pasternack - say 12 inches long, using the coaxial cable type that you usually use (SR402AL, RG58U or RG316U), with a N connector at one end and a (cheaper) BNC or TNC at the other end. I used two BNC male connectors and short circuited the one, and soldered two 1/8th Watt 100 Ohm resistors in parallel over the other as a 50 Ohm load.
DIY VNA Tuning Plugs: Short and 50 Ohm Load
Then get your VNA manual and calibrate it with an Open, Short and Load. I prefer BNC connectors for use in a lab, since they are easy to connect. In the field, a TNC may be more secure.
For added Brownie points, you can mount the two connectors in a metal box and label it to make it easier to find your tuning kit again...
Slots and Cutouts
A smooth, regular sided patch - square or otherwise - tends to oscillate in a single mode and has a very narrow bandwidth of 2 to 3%. By cutting little slots on the side or middle of a patch, multiple oscillation modes can be excited and then the bandwidth can become very wide indeed. For example the famous U-slot of K.F. Tong can achieve 20 to 30% BW. Mr Tong must have been a very patient guy, since he sat down and made 27 different shaped U-slots and measured them all!
Cutting a slot with a Dremel cutting wheel tool is a whole lot of fun - you get glass and metal powder in your clothes, hair, eyes and will itch for days after... I came to prefer tin snips and a nibbling tool as a result: https://www.digikey.com/product-detail/en/gc-electronics/12-1806/GC395-ND/258502
Slot perturbations can cause cross polarization, which is fine if you actually want to have cross polarization - it is sort of midway between linear and circular. For my application, I wanted pure circular polarization, so I tried to avoid slots and funny feeds and rather widened the BW with 4 patches of slightly different sizes, but it turned out to be too difficult to replicate. I think I now have almost as many discarded PCB squares as Mr Tong. Note that discarded 900 MHz pieces can be reused for 2.4 GHz patches, so there is an advantage to starting at the lower end of the spectrum...
Two small 20 mm slots, the width of the nibbling tool, made the patch design much less sensitive and widened the bandwidth about 10 times to 40 MHz, so that is what I eventually used:
- W = 143 mm, L = 133 mm, h = 9 mm, Slots = 20 mm (by 5 mm)
- Material = FR4, 1/32 inch single sided, copper side up
- Spacers: 9 mm nylon, one near each corner
- Connector feed: BNC, mounted on bottom ground plane
920 MHz Test Patch with 20 mm Slots
As you can see from the nibbling tool debris field under my chair, I tried several different configurations and found that bigger slots are certainly not better. The small 20 mm edge notches successfully reduced the Q and made the antenna design repeatable. If you follow the above instructions and copy this design within ~0.5 mm, it should work fine over the 902 till 928 MHz ISM band.
Slot Debris Field
Cleaning this kind of cruft up again, is quite a chore.
The test patch feed is a BNC wall mount socket directly under it in the ground plane board. For an array antenna, use a double sided ground plane board and run a microstripline with a pin feed up to the patch, or for a one-off home/lab use antenna, use RG316U coax.
Test Antenna BNC Feed
Since I am not a complete masochist, I avoid circular patches, since it is difficult to cut a circle with tin snips!
It is interesting to note that square, rectangular, triangular and circular patches are equivalent. It is possible to make an antenna with exactly the same electrical specifications using any one of these shapes.
Once you made your spiffy new antenna, you may need to enclose it in a waterproof jacket. The best way to do it, is to include the radome material in your experiments and fine tuning the whole sandwich right from the beginning. By doing this, you can make the assembly very thin, with the radome in contact with the patch.
However, if you later make a radome add-on, then you may be relieved to know that provided that you keep the radome material at least 10 mm or so away from the patch, it will be reasonably transparent and won't affect the antenna significantly.
For airborne use, Polycarbonate or Glass Fibre reinforced Epoxy are good materials to consider for a radome. For a ground antenna, ABS or Nylon may be good enough.
A decent radome needs a hydrophobic coating, to cause water to bead and run off: http://www.hirecpaint.com/product_hirec100.html
It is quite easy to make a test microstripline, using a piece of single sided PCB and copper tape.
The Pasternack Microstripline Calculator is handy: https://www.pasternack.com/t-calculator-microstrip.aspx
- FR4 Fibreglass/Epoxy PCB Dielectric Constant = 4.3
- Width = 3 mm
- Height = 1.6 mm
- Width/Height = 1.875
- Effective Dielectric Constant = 3.257
- Impedance = 51.36 Ohm
- VF = 1/sqrt(3.257) = 0.555
Microstripline Test Piece
With a sharp pencil and even sharper scissors, cut a 5/8th wavelength, 113 mm long, 3 mm wide strip and stick it to the PCB. Mount two 100 Ohm resistors in parallel on one end and a BNC connector on the other end. Glue the BNC on with epoxy first before you solder it, else it will lift the tape.
Why 5/8th wavelenth? Avoid an exact 1/4 wave transformer for this test.
With your VNA, you can now measure the impedance, or make a Smith Chart.
Microstripline Smith Chart
If your hands were steady, it will measure ~50 Ohm, proving that the Pasternack calculator works well enough (OR, that my low cost Chinese VNA works well enough!).
Air Dielectric Power Divider/Combiner
Note that one cannot reach 200 Ohm with 1.6 mm FR4 PCB. A 3.2 mm board can work, but 3.2 mm board is heavy and hard to work with and if you saw it, then you end up with itch powder all over the place again.
An air dielectric taper would be good for 200 Ohm, at 6 mm high, 2 mm wide, but the 50 Ohm side would be 'too wide' - 100 Ohm would be more practical, so one may need to do the impedance conversion in multiple stages (or use a sloped transmission line, as explained later on).
Tapered Power Divider
A suspended air gap power splitter is a hassle to make, but it can solder directly to the pin of a panel mounted BNC connector, so making a little 4 bladed fan does have merit. When a strip line gets too wide, it starts to radiate, like a patch antenna, so one has to be reasonable with the maximum width of the taper.
Tapered Power Divider Test Set
Power Divider Smith Chart
Four 100 Ohm resistors were soldered on the ends of the tapers to test the circuit. The result works quite well. The impedance varies between 38 and 55 Ohm and is 48 Ohm in the middle of the band. The VSWR varies between 1.1 and 1.4 over the whole band.
The taper lines create a good wide band device which is not critical and which can be replicated without undue trouble. A wide band four way power divider/combiner like this, can cost hundreds of dollars when you buy it off the shelf.
Using strips of PCB and copper tape, with a whole lot of patience and a big mug of hot chocolate, one can make a tinker toy kit, to hook up four patches to form an array antenna.
More Accurate Dielectric Constant
In order to make reasonably accurate delay lines, it is useful to have a more accurate value for the dielectric constant and velocity factor. One could use impedance controlled PTFE/Ceramic board, but a typical Radio Amateur will not have the pocket money for that.
One way to measure and calculate the dielectric constant is with a microstripline resonator circuit. The VNA can then scan and measure the resonant frequency and then one can recalculate the dielectric constant:
First, a handful of formulas that you need to figure out:
L = c/f
VF = 1/sqrt(E)
Le = L x VF
Le = L/sqrt(E)
E = (L/Le)^^2
Once you made peace with the above, assume for FR4 1.6 mm board E = 4.3 at f = 915 MHz and c = 299792458 m/s
L = 299792458 / 915000000 = 0.328 m
Le = 0.328 / sqrt(4.3) = 0.158 m
Radius of the test resonator:
2 x Pi x r = 0.158 m
r = 0.158 / (2 x Pi) = 0.0251 m
From Pasternack's microstripline calculator and the test way above:
50 Ohm stripline on 1.6 mm FR4 = 3 mm wide
Make the above resonator and measure the real resonance frequency fr.
For example fr = 920 MHz
Finally, calculate the more accurate dielectric constant Er and Velocity Factor VF:
L = 299792458 / 920000000 = 0.326 m
Er = (0.326 / 0.158) ^^2 = 4.26
VF = 1/sqrt(4.26) = 0.485
Another way, is to go back to the microstripline test piece way above, remove the 50 Ohm load, put a second connector on it and measure S21 with the VNA and look at the 'Unwrapped Phase Trace': https://www.rfglobalnet.com/doc/methods-for-unambiguous-electrical-delay-measurements-using-a-vector-network-analyzer-0001
Making a circular resonator may be more fun though!
Either way, once you have a better idea of the actual dielectric constant and velocity factor of the striplines on your batch of printed circuit boards, the next step is to make a set of delay lines that will transform the impedance from 100 Ohm to 50 Ohm and delay the signal by 0, 90, 180 and 270 Degrees respectively, for each of the four patches.
To transform the impedance from 100 Ohm to 50 Ohm, I made four microstriplines on 1.6 mm board of length 55 mm, 1.5 mm at one end and 3 mm at the other end. This worked, but was a whole lotta hassle...
Coax PhasingEventually, I made the delay lines from RG316U (a.k.a. RG316D) coaxial cable, fed through from the back of the ground plane. The velocity factor of RG316U is 0.795, so the effective wavelength Le = 228 mm. This is good for a one off lab/home antenna. Microstriplines are better for mass production.
The first cable is 80 mm and each next one is a 1/4 wave longer:
1) 80 mm
2) 137 mm
3) 194 mm
4) 251 mm
You could cut each cable 15 mm longer than that and strip 5 mm at one end and 10 mm at the other end. The important thing is the exact difference in length between them, not the overall length.
Sloped and Tapered Power Divider
I finally made an even simpler power divider, consisting of four sloped transmission lines. If one would glue or tie the end of a RG316U coax to the reflector board, then the centre is 1.2 mm above the board. I then placed four pieces of 65 mm SWG20 copper wire, sloped from the coax to the end of the BNC connector, 6 mm above the board.
A thing should be as simple as possible,
but no simpler.
-- Albert Einstein
SWG20 wire is 0.9 mm diameter and at 6 mm height, is 230 Ohm. Addition of a thin triangle of copper foil, 5 mm wide at the bottom coax end at 1.2 mm height above ground, transforms 50 Ohm to 200 Ohm. Four 200 Ohm lines in parallel, is 50 Ohm at the connector.
Sloped Wires With Copper Triangles
Fold copper tape around the 20 SWG wire, mark the triangle with a pencil and trim it with scissors - super easy for a one off home/lab experimental build. The PCB methods are easier for a factory build.
Sloped Tapered Power Divider
Clearly, there is more than one way to do it, but I particularly like the sloped and tapered design, since it is the simplest and it keeps the transmission lines further away from the patches. I think this one will do O'l Einstein proud.
After putting the whole kit and kaboodle together for the umpteenth time, the centre frequency was 902 MHz, which is a few MHz too low to my liking. All four patches therefore need to be trimmed a couple mm smaller all around again. I'll do it another day!
900MHz Quad Array VSWR
The VSWR plot shows that the slots opened up the bandwidth quite a bit.
900 MHz Quad Array Impedance
The impedance match and return loss are actually quite good. It shows that the tapered transmission lines do their job very well.
900 MHz Quad Array Return Loss
A Smith chart is always a good summary of the whole ball of wax.
900 MHz Quad Array Smith Chart
I have read numerous articles that alledge that stacking a parasitic patch on top of a radiating patch, will increase the bandwidth. However, when I tried it, it halved the bandwidth!
So who does one believe now? I believe my VNA: To measure, is to know.
I guess that to really open the BW, the top patch will have to be a little smaller than the driven patch, not the exact same size as on my first try. I'll give this another spin some day.
To Explore Further
- Trim the patches 1 mm smaller on each side (it is difficult to cut off only a little bit), to move the frequency up by a few MHz.
- Try a patch with two slots on each side - that should open up the bandwidth a little more.
- Make the power divider from two pieces of PCB, instead of wire and tape, to make it stronger.
OK - copying and improving this design will sure keep you busy and out of trouble with your significant other for a while!
Good work ..minute details revealed.thanksReplyDelete
How do you suppose the beam width changes as you add patches?ReplyDelete
In general, the beam width decreases when you use more patches. A 9 patch array will have much narrower beam than a quad for example. A radar antenna can have hundreds of little patches.ReplyDelete