Skip to main content

Driving A 900 MHz Quad Patch Array Antenna

A Circular Polarized Quad Patch Array for the 900 MHz ISM Band

Driving a patch array antenna is a tricky and multidisciplinary affair - a combination of electrics, magnetics and mechanics - where theory meets reality.  Patch antennas are useful between about 1 and 5 GHz.  Below that, they are too big and above that, too small to be practical for the manufacturing tolerances of a hobbyist.  For L, S and C-band, a radio amateur can use patches with good effect, using not much more than tin snips and a nibble tool.

902-928 MHz ISM Band LCP Quad Patch Antenna

The patch antenna theory can be explored with a simulation program such as NEC2:

You could make an array with any number of patches, but more than four would be a whole lot of hassle.  A SAR radar antenna may have 300 tiny little patches.  However, a two by two is about the limit of my patience.

Any piece of metal within half a wavelength of an antenna, becomes part of the antenna and an array antenna is the sum of its parts.  If you want to construct a phased array with circular polarization, then it is even more true.

To work with microwave antennas, you must have a fairly decent two port vector network analyzer (A KC901V costs only about $2500 on Aliexpress).  The Q of a microwave antenna is very high and reality will always differ from the design by a few percent.  Therefore, your design will have to be tuned and tweaked to get it right, since the overall bandwidth is only a few percent.

A patch antenna is a ridiculously sensitive thing.  You have to mount it very securely with nylon standoffs and use good quality connectors and cables, otherwise your results will not be repeatable. 

Let me say that again:

A patch antenna is a ridiculously sensitive thing.  You have to mount it very securely with nylon standoffs and use good quality connectors and cables, otherwise your results will not be repeatable. 

It may be good to say that a third time...

If you assemble a rough test patch and measure it, then quickly take it apart and put it back together without changing anything and measure it again, the centre frequency can be several MHz different - it can shift by more than the bandwidth of the patch antenna for no apparent reason.  Therefore, tuning a patch antenna requires a lot of patience and you got to assemble it with care: Nuts, bolts, connectors - the whole nine yards.  Otherwise you will waste your own time.

I have looked at many different patch array antennas and came to the conclusion that all of them are too complex to my liking and that there is room to simplify the design of the patch layout and the drive circuitry, to make one that is more easily tunable and manufacturable.

Impedance matching of a single patch is relatively easy.  At the edge it is 100 to 200 Ohm and at the centre zero Ohm.   In between those, you can get 50 or 75 Ohm for a coaxial cable drive, or you can work directly with the measured impedance on the edge, if fed with a microstripline.

I probe it for a 50 Ohm spot by drilling a few little holes 25 to 35% from the edge and pick the best one for a coaxial cable to a VNA and then, once tuned up, measure the edge impedance for a microstripline feed.  With a little experience and luck, the very first hole can be spot on.

A probe (pin) feed is fine if the patch is not ridiculously thick, with h < 3% of the wavelength.

 FR4 Patch Test Antenna

Microstriplines and patches can be designed with the Pasternack or Microwaves 101 calculators, which will provide a good starting point for your new tin snipping hobby:

In a single patch antenna, one can achieve circular polaration either by phasing the drive signal (by driving two sides with a 90 degree phase shift), or by perturbing the dimensions (to cause a current and field shift).  In this case, the phasing approach tends to yield better circular polarization - the mechanical trimming result is more elliptical.

Similarly, an array can achieve circular polarization by using multiple circular polarized elements, or by rotating and phasing the drive of the elements.  Again, the rotating and phasing approach is more circular and the other more elliptical.

Another problem with a patch antenna is that it is a very narrow band device.  If you tune a patch to 915 MHz (The centre of the ISM band), it may have a VSWR at that frequency of 1.2, but at the edges of the band, it may be 2 or 3, which is not so good.   The bandwidth of the patch can be increased by increasing the height above the ground plane (decreasing the capacitance), but that will reduce the centre frequency also, so you need to trim it slightly smaller.   The maximum usable height is about 3 to 5% of the wavelength.

Return Loss Plot of a Test Antenna

To get the phasing of the patches right, you need to use different length transmission lines.  With 4 patches, a successive shift of 90 degrees is required, which, if done with a single piece of line, will act like a quarter wave transformer, which may be an unwanted side effect.  Also, the length of the line is dependent on the frequency, so the phasing circuit will make the antenna even more frequency sensitive.

One way to increase the bandwidth of the array, is to tune each patch to a slightly different frequency (by changing the spacing with little nylon washers).   Intuitively, you can think of a Yagi or Log Periodic array, where each piece of wire is tuned differently, yet all the elements work together as one.  The same thing happens in a patch array with slightly differently tuned elements - the overall bandwidth of the array then opens up.

Therefore, instead of designing all four patches for exactly 915 MHz, one could tune them to 912, 914, 916 and 918 MHz, or 910, 913, 916 and 919 MHz and achieve better performance over the whole 902 to 928 MHz ISM band.

Alternatively, one could cut a notch in the left and right sides of a patch, which could increase the bandwidth from 3 % to about 10 % while still keeping it linear polarized, but cutting the notches will reduce the centre frequency a little bit and you may have to adjust the height by 1 mm to compensate.  Choices, choices...

Power Divider/Combiner
The patch feeds need to be divided/combined into one drive signal.  It can be done with a succession of Wilkenson dividers, but when you also need to create a phase shift and an impedance match for each patch, it becomes a rather complex and narrow band affair.

Unified Phasing, Power and Impedance Matching
When you need to do power dividing/combining, you also need to match to different impedances.  Two impedances can be matched with a quarter wave transformer, but that is a narrow band device.  A more broadband match can be achieved with three transformers in series.

If you squint at a series of quarter wave transformers, they resemble a tapered line and it was found that a tapered line of one or more quarter wavelengths, does indeed provide impedance matching with a significantly broader bandwidth than discrete 1/4 wave transformers.

The ultimate is the Klopfenstein Taper:  However, a longer linear taper works just as well in practice.

This leads to the following conclusion for a circular polarized array:
  • Place the 4 patches 1 to 1.25 effective wavelength (in air) apart (centre to centre).
  • To combine 4 transmission lines and get a 50 Ohm drive impedance, each line should be 200 Ohm (like 4 resistors in parallel) at the coaxial connector, OR
  • Make an H circuit and convert 50 Ohm to 100 Ohm to 50 Ohm using 6 striplines.
  • On the patch side, the transmission line should match to the patch impedance.
  • The first line is however long it needs to be and an odd multiple of 1/8th wavelength overall - to avoid making a 1/4 wave transformer.
  • To get a succession of phase shifts, each transmission line should be 1/4 wave longer than the previous. 
  • Each patch should be rotated by 90 degrees, compared to the previous. 
  • To improve the bandwidth, use long tapered lines and avoid the inadvertent creation of 1/4 wave transformers.
  • To reduce spurious transmissions from the microstriplines, do not make sharp corners.  Rather make 45 degree corners, or smooth S lines.

Simple Array Drive Solution
As O'l Albert Einstein said:

A thing should be as simple as possible, but no simpler.

The final drive result is a simple four legged cross of microstriplines, each leg of the spider longer than the previous by a quarter wavelength (At the specific de-tuned patch frequency).
Quad Patch Layout

Each microstripline leg should be tapered from 200 Ohm at the connector and pass underneath the patch with a feed probe to the 50 Ohm (~3 mm wide) point.  However, since a 200 Ohm microstripline is too thin to be practical, it would need thicker 3.2 mm board.  Therefore, rather create an H shaped circuit and convert 50 to 100 Ohm, combine them and convert to 100 Ohm again and then join these in the middle - I'll make a better sketch later.
The gap between the patches should be 1/2 wavelength to minimize the size of the sidelobes.  Therefore, the optimal centre to centre spacing is 1.5, or just a tad more to minimize weird standing waves at 1.56 wavelength.

Tweaking and Tinkering
A low cost patch array antenna can be built from FR4 PCB. At 1 GHz, the permittivity of this board is about 4.3.  To tweak your design, make a 50 Ohm strip, 3 mm wide and  5/8th wavelength long.  Solder two 1/8th Watt 100 Ohm resistors in parallel over the far end to terminate it and measure it with a VNA.  (Putting two resistors in parallel, reduces their inductance by half).  This way you can get a fudge factor for the permittivity, track width and wave length to tweak your designs with.

You can experiment with microstriplines and patch antennas using copper tape on single sided PCB and a (new!) pair of sharp scissors: or from my favourite high tech electronics store:

You will also need a large variety of nylon bolts, nuts and spacers for tuning purposes.  Digikey has a good selection:

This assumes that your VNA is tuned!

To tune a VNA, buy a decent quality ready made short coaxial cable from Pasternack - say 12 inches long, using the coaxial cable type that you usually use (SR402AL, RG58U or RG316U), with a N connector at one end and a (cheaper) BNC or TNC at the other end.  I used two BNC male connectors and short circuited the one, and soldered two 1/8th Watt 100 Ohm resistors in parallel over the other as a 50 Ohm load.

DIY VNA Tuning Plugs: Short and 50 Ohm Load

Then get your VNA manual and calibrate it with an Open, Short and Load.  I prefer BNC connectors for use in a lab, since they are easy to connect.  In the field, a TNC may be more secure.

For added Brownie points, you can mount the two connectors in a metal box and label it to make it easier to find your tuning kit again...

Slots and Cutouts
A smooth, regular sided patch - square or otherwise - tends to oscillate in a single mode and has a very narrow bandwidth of 2 to 3%.  By cutting little slots on the side or middle of a patch, multiple oscillation modes can be excited and then the bandwidth can become very wide indeed.  For example the famous U-slot of K.F. Tong can achieve 20 to 30% BW.  Mr Tong must have been a very patient guy, since he sat down and made 27 different shaped U-slots and measured them all!

Cutting a slot with a Dremel cutting wheel tool is a whole lot of fun - you get glass and metal powder in your clothes, hair, eyes and will itch for days after...  I came to prefer tin snips and a nibbling tool as a result:

Slot perturbations can cause cross polarization, which is fine if you actually want to have cross polarization - it is sort of midway between linear and circular.  For my application, I wanted pure circular polarization, so I tried to avoid slots and funny feeds and rather widened the BW with 4 patches of slightly different sizes, but it turned out to be too difficult to replicate.  I think I now have almost as many discarded PCB squares as Mr Tong.  Note that discarded 900 MHz pieces can be reused for 2.4 GHz patches, so there is an advantage to starting at the lower end of the spectrum...

Two small 20 mm slots, the width of the nibbling tool, made the patch design much less sensitive and widened the bandwidth about 10 times to 40 MHz, so that is what I eventually used:
  • W = 143 mm, L = 133 mm, h = 9 mm, Slots = 20 mm (by 5 mm)
  • Material = FR4, 1/32 inch single sided, copper side up
  • Spacers: 9 mm nylon, one near each corner
  • Connector feed: BNC, mounted on bottom ground plane
FR4 fibreglass PCB is easier to work than copper or tin sheet, since it flexes and doesn't bend permanently - so when you are done drilling, cutting and trimming, it is still flat and doesn't look like a corrugated roof sheet after a hurricane.  The only drawback is the itching from getting glass dust in your skin - a lab coat and a Dustbuster help a lot.  The patch is made from thin 0.8 mm board to reduce the effect of the dielectric and the ground plane from regular 1.6 mm board - for mechanical stiffness.

920 MHz Test Patch with 20 mm Slots

As you can see from the nibbling tool debris field under my chair, I tried several different configurations and found that bigger slots are certainly not better.   The small 20 mm edge notches successfully reduced the Q and made the antenna design repeatable.  If you follow the above instructions and copy this design within ~0.5 mm, it should work fine over the 902 till 928 MHz ISM band.

Slot Debris Field

Cleaning this kind of cruft up again, is quite a chore.

The test patch feed is a BNC wall mount socket directly under it in the ground plane board.  For an array antenna, use a double sided ground plane board and run a microstripline with a pin  feed up to the patch, or for a one-off home/lab use antenna, use RG316U coax.

Test Antenna BNC Feed

Since I am not a complete masochist, I avoid circular patches, since it is difficult to cut a circle with tin snips!

It is interesting to note that square, rectangular, triangular and circular patches are equivalent.  It is possible to make an antenna with exactly the same electrical specifications using any one of these shapes.

Once you made your spiffy new antenna, you may need to enclose it in a waterproof jacket.  The best way to do it, is to include the radome material in your experiments and fine tuning the whole sandwich right from the beginning.  By doing this, you can make the assembly very thin, with the radome in contact with the patch.

However, if you later make a radome add-on, then you may be relieved to know that provided that you keep the radome material at least 10 mm or so away from the patch, it will be reasonably transparent and won't affect the antenna significantly.

For airborne use, Polycarbonate or Glass Fibre reinforced Epoxy are good materials to consider for a radome.  For a ground antenna, ABS or Nylon may be good enough.

A decent radome needs a hydrophobic coating, to cause water to bead and run off:

It is quite easy to make a test microstripline, using a piece of single sided PCB and copper tape.

The Pasternack Microstripline Calculator is handy:
  • FR4 Fibreglass/Epoxy PCB Dielectric Constant = 4.3
  • Width = 3 mm
  • Height = 1.6 mm
  • Width/Height = 1.875
  • Effective Dielectric Constant = 3.257
  • Impedance = 51.36 Ohm
The effective Dielectric Constant gives the Velocity factor:
  • VF = 1/sqrt(3.257) = 0.555
At the speed of light, the wavelength of 915 MHz is 328 mmMultiply that with VF for the effective wavelength in the microstripline Le = 182 mm.  This is the value to use for length calculations of 1/4 wave transformers and tapers.

Microstripline Test Piece

With a sharp pencil and even sharper scissors, cut a 5/8th wavelength, 113 mm long, 3 mm wide strip and stick it to the PCB.  Mount two 100 Ohm resistors in parallel on one end and a BNC connector on the other end.  Glue the BNC on with epoxy first before you solder it, else it will lift the tape.

Why 5/8th wavelenth?  Avoid an exact 1/4 wave transformer for this test.

 Microstripline Impedance

With your VNA, you can now measure the impedance, or make a Smith Chart.

Microstripline Smith Chart

If your hands were steady, it will measure ~50 Ohm, proving that the Pasternack calculator works well enough (OR, that my low cost Chinese VNA works well enough!).

Air Dielectric Power Divider/Combiner
Note that one cannot reach 200 Ohm with 1.6 mm FR4 PCB.  A 3.2 mm board can work, but 3.2 mm board is heavy and hard to work with and if you saw it, then you end up with itch powder all over the place again.

An air dielectric taper would be good for 200 Ohm, at 6 mm high, 2 mm wide, but the 50 Ohm side would be 'too wide' - 100 Ohm would be more practical, so one may need to do the impedance conversion in multiple stages (or use a sloped transmission line, as explained later on).

Tapered Power Divider

A suspended air gap power splitter is a hassle to make, but it can solder directly to the pin of a panel mounted BNC connector, so making a little 4 bladed fan does have merit.  When a strip line gets too wide, it starts to radiate, like a patch antenna, so one has to be reasonable with the maximum width of the taper.

 Tapered Power Divider Test Set

To make a 200 Ohm to 100 Ohm taper line with copper tape on FR4 board requires great care and dexterity.  With 6 mm spacing, 200 Ohm is 2 mm and 100 Ohm is 10 mm wide. A quarter wave at 915 MHz with 0.555 Velocity Factor is 46 mm and with a VF of 0.666, it is 55 mm.  So I erred on the long side for wider bandwidth and cut a piece of blank board 110 mm long and 30 mm wide for the divider with a somewhat larger single sided board as earth plane and put the connector in the middle.

 Power Divider Smith Chart

Four 100 Ohm resistors were soldered on the ends of the tapers to test the circuit.  The result works quite well.  The impedance varies between 38 and 55 Ohm and is 48 Ohm in the middle of the band.  The VSWR varies between 1.1 and 1.4 over the whole band.

The taper lines create a good wide band device which is not critical and which can be replicated without undue trouble.  A wide band four way power divider/combiner like this, can cost hundreds of dollars when you buy it off the shelf.

Using strips of PCB and copper tape, with a whole lot of patience and a big mug of hot chocolate, one can make a tinker toy kit, to hook up four patches to form an array antenna.

More Accurate Dielectric Constant
In order to make reasonably accurate delay lines, it is useful to have a more accurate value for the dielectric constant and velocity factor.  One could use impedance controlled PTFE/Ceramic board, but a typical Radio Amateur will not have the pocket money for that.

One way to measure and calculate the dielectric constant is with a microstripline resonator circuit.  The VNA can then scan and measure the resonant frequency and then one can recalculate the dielectric constant:

First, a handful of formulas that you need to figure out:
L = c/f
VF = 1/sqrt(E)
Le = L x VF
Le = L/sqrt(E)
E = (L/Le)^^2

Once you made peace with the above, assume for FR4 1.6 mm board E = 4.3 at f = 915 MHz and c = 299792458 m/s

L = 299792458 / 915000000 = 0.328 m
Le = 0.328 / sqrt(4.3) = 0.158 m

Radius of the test resonator:
2 x Pi x r = 0.158 m
r = 0.158 / (2 x Pi) = 0.0251 m

From Pasternack's microstripline calculator and the test way above:
50 Ohm stripline on 1.6 mm FR4 = 3 mm wide

Make the above resonator and measure the real resonance frequency fr.
For example fr = 920 MHz

Finally, calculate the more accurate dielectric constant Er and Velocity Factor VF:
L = 299792458 / 920000000 = 0.326 m
Er = (0.326 / 0.158) ^^2 = 4.26
VF = 1/sqrt(4.26) = 0.485

Another way, is to go back to the microstripline test piece way above, remove the 50 Ohm load, put a second connector on it and measure S21 with the VNA and look at the 'Unwrapped Phase Trace':

Making a circular resonator may be more fun though!

Either way, once you have a better idea of the actual dielectric constant and velocity factor of the striplines on your batch of printed circuit boards, the next step is to make a set of delay lines that will transform the impedance from 100 Ohm to 50 Ohm and delay the signal by 0, 90, 180 and 270 Degrees respectively, for each of the four patches.

To transform the impedance from 100 Ohm to 50 Ohm, I made four microstriplines on 1.6 mm board of length 55 mm, 1.5 mm at one end and 3 mm at the other end.  This worked, but was a whole lotta hassle...

Coax Phasing
Eventually, I made the delay lines from RG316U (a.k.a. RG316D) coaxial cable, fed through from the back of the ground plane.  The velocity factor of RG316U is 0.795, so the effective wavelength Le = 228 mm.  This is good for a one off lab/home antenna.  Microstriplines are better for mass production.

The first cable is 80 mm and each next one is a 1/4 wave longer:
1) 80 mm
2) 137 mm
3) 194 mm
4) 251 mm

You could cut each cable 15 mm longer than that and strip 5 mm at one end and 10 mm at the other end.  The important thing is the exact difference in length between them, not the overall length.

Sloped and Tapered Power Divider
I finally made an even simpler power divider, consisting of four sloped transmission lines.  If one would glue or tie the end of a RG316U coax to the reflector board, then the centre is 1.2 mm above the board.  I then placed four pieces of 65 mm SWG20 copper wire, sloped from the coax to the end of the BNC connector, 6 mm above the board.

A thing should be as simple as possible,
but no simpler.
-- Albert Einstein

SWG20 wire is 0.9 mm diameter and at 6 mm height, is 230 Ohm.  Addition of a thin triangle of copper foil, 5 mm wide at the bottom coax end at 1.2 mm height above ground, transforms 50 Ohm to 200 Ohm.  Four 200 Ohm lines in parallel, is 50 Ohm at the connector.

Sloped Wires With Copper Triangles

Fold copper tape around the 20 SWG wire, mark the triangle with a pencil and trim it with scissors - super easy for a one off home/lab experimental build.  The PCB methods are easier for a factory build.

Sloped Tapered Power Divider

Clearly, there is more than one way to do it, but I particularly like the sloped and tapered design, since it is the simplest and it keeps the transmission lines further away from the patches.  I think this one will do O'l Einstein proud.

After putting the whole kit and kaboodle together for the umpteenth time, the centre frequency was 902 MHz, which is a few MHz too low to my liking.  All four patches therefore need to be trimmed a couple mm smaller all around again.  I'll do it another day!

 900MHz Quad Array VSWR

The VSWR plot shows that the slots opened up the bandwidth quite a bit.

 900 MHz Quad Array Impedance

The impedance match and return loss are actually quite good.  It shows that the tapered transmission lines do their job very well.

 900 MHz Quad Array Return Loss

A Smith chart is always a good summary of the whole ball of wax.

900 MHz Quad Array Smith Chart

Parasitic Patches
I have read numerous articles that alledge that stacking a parasitic patch on top of a radiating patch, will increase the bandwidth.  However, when I tried it, it halved the bandwidth!

So who does one believe now?  I believe my VNA:  To measure, is to know.

I guess that to really open the BW, the top patch will have to be a little smaller than the driven patch, not the exact same size as on my first try.  I'll give this another spin some day.

To Explore Further
  • Trim the patches 1 mm smaller on each side (it is difficult to cut off only a little bit), to move the frequency up by a few MHz.
  • Try a patch with two slots on each side - that should open up the bandwidth a little more, but slots will lower the resonance frequency also. (If you trimmed a patch juuust too small, nibble tiny side slots to drag the centre frequency down again!).
  • Make the power divider from two pieces of PCB, instead of wire and tape, to make it stronger.
Now it just needs to get cooler, so I can measure the antenna pattern outdoors.  At the moment it is 11 pm and still 37 Celsius here in the desert.

OK - copying and improving this design will sure keep you busy and out of trouble with your significant other for a while!

La voila!



  1. Good work ..minute details revealed.thanks

  2. How do you suppose the beam width changes as you add patches?

  3. In general, the beam width decreases when you use more patches. A 9 patch array will have much narrower beam than a quad for example. A radar antenna can have hundreds of little patches.


Post a Comment

On topic comments are welcome. Junk will be deleted.

Popular posts from this blog

Parasitic Quadrifilar Helical Antenna

This article was reprinted in OSCAR News, March 2018: If you want to receive Satellite Weather Pictures , then you need a decent antenna, otherwise you will receive more noise than picture. For polar orbit satellites, one needs an antenna with a mushroom shaped radiation pattern .  It needs to have strong gain towards the horizon where the satellites are distant, less gain upwards where they are close and as little as possible downwards, which would be wasted and a source of noise.  Most satellites are spin stabilized and therefore the antenna also needs circular polarization, otherwise the received signal will flutter as the antennas rotate through nulls. The helical antenna, first proposed by Kraus in 1948, is the natural solution to circular polarized satellite communications.  It is a simple twisted wire - there seems to be nothing to it.  Various papers have been published on helix antennas, so the operation is pretty well understood. Therefore,

Weather Satellite Turnstile Antennas for the 2 meter Band

NEC2, 2 m band, 146 MHz, Yagi Turnstile Simulation and Build This article describes a Turnstile Antenna for the 2 meter band, 146 MHz amateur satcom, 137 MHz NOAA and Russian Meteor weather satellites.  Weather satellite reception is described here .  A quadrifilar helical antenna is described here .   Engineering, is the art of making what you need,  from what you can get. Radiation Pattern of the Three Element Yagi-Uda Antenna Once one combine and cross two Yagis, the pattern becomes distinctly twisted. The right hand polarization actually becomes visible in the radiation pattern plot, which I found really cool. Radiation Pattern of Six Element Turnstile Antenna Only a true RF Geek can appreciate the twisted invisible inner beauty of a herring bone antenna... Six Element Turnstile Antenna Essentially, it is three crosses on a stick.  The driven elements are broken in the middle at the drive points.  The other elements can go straight throug

Patch Antenna Design with NEC2

The older free Numerical Electromagnetic Code version 2 (NEC2) from Lawrence Livermore Lab assumes an air dielectric.  This makes it hard (but not impossible) for a radio amateur to experiment with Printed Circuit Board Patch antennas and micro strip lines. Air Spaced Patch Antenna Radiation Pattern You could use the free ASAP simulation program , which handles thin dielectrics, you could shell out a few hundred Dollars for a copy of NEC4 , You could buy GEMACS if you live in the USA, or you could add distributed capacitors to a NEC2 model with LD cards (hook up one capacitor in the middle of each element.), but that is far too much money/trouble for most. More information on driving an array antenna can be found here: l Air Dielectric Patch   The obvious lazy solution is to accept the limitation and make an air dielectric patch antenna. An advantage of using air dielectric, is that the antenn