Skip to main content

Yagi Antenna for 900 MHz ISM Band

I like tinkering with wire antenna designs, since they are simple and cheap to make.  Mr Yagi invented his antenna about 100 years ago, but there are still some things left to learn about it.

900 MHz ISM Band Yagi

The 900 MHz ISM band ranges from 902 to 928 MHz.  Covering the whole band with a single Yagi antenna is difficult, since they are inherently narrow band devices.  Consequently some tweaking is required and the result below is a desensitized design that can be built and replicated quite easily, but you need a network analyzer - "To Measure, is to Know!"

A Yagi generally consists of a Reflector, Radiator and one or more Director elements, arranged on a boom.  For a small Yagi, a wooden ruler works a treat, since one can easily mark the position of the wires.  The wire elements are fastened to the bottom of the ruler with hot glue.  The wire elements are  made from straightened out jumbo size paper clips.  The balun, is two clip-on Ferrites, to prevent current flowing on the sleeve of the co-ax, disrupting the pattern.  Winding a ferrite bobbin balun, is not quite worth the hassle to me.

You can plot the pattern of a Yagi with NEC2, but NEC2 does not provide accurate impedance, or VSWR plots and the simulation operating frequency will be lower by about 4% as well, because NEC2 does not automatically compensate for the end effects of the wire rods - you need to add a load card with a tiny capacitor (0.01 to 0.1 pF) for each element end.  For serious Yagi design, you probably need to consider NEC4 or FECO, but if you are aware of the 3 to 4% systematic errors of NEC2, then it doesn't matter, so I never could be bothered to actually buy NEC4!

Stray capacitance calculator:

There are many Yagi antenna tables and calculators on the wild wild web.  I used an Optimized Wide Bandwidth Array (OWA) design, with the first reflector very close (~0.05 Lambda) to the dipole:

Javascript Version 12.01.2014, based on Rothammel / DL6WU
Frequency     :  930  MHz
Wavelength    :  323  mm
Rod Diameter  :  1  mm
Boom Diameter :  1  mm
Boom Length   :  231  mm
d/lambda      :  0.003    ( min.: 0.002 , max.: 0.01 )
D/lambda      :  0.010    ( min.: 0.01 , max.: 0.05 )
Elements      :  5
Gain          :  7.99 dBd (approx.)
Reflector Length   : 155 mm
Reflector Position :  0 mm
Folded Dipole Position : 77 mm, Length: 144 mm
Director #1 Position : 102 mm ,  Length : 147 mm
Distance Dipole - Dir. #1 : 24 mm 
Director #2 Position : 160 mm ,  Length : 145 mm
Distance Dir. #1 - Dir. #2 : 58 mm 
Director #3 Position : 229 mm ,  Length : 144 mm
Distance Dir. #2 - Dir. #3 : 69 mm 
Directors / Parasitics are isolated.
Please choose an isolater thicker than : 2 mm

Make the folded dipole of a length between the reflector and the director and then tweak it till it is reasonably well tuned to the frequency you want.

Several rules of thumb have been developed over the decades and if whatever online design calculator or tables you use differs much from the below rules, then you should be suspicious:
  • The reflector is a little longer than the dipole radiator
  • The directors are a little shorter than the radiator
  • The elements are 3% to 5% shorter than half a wavelength.
  • The spacing between the elements is between 0.1 and 0.2 wavelength.
  • The gain in dB is about equal to the number of elements.

900 MHz Yagi - Voltage Standing Wave Ratio

A Yagi tends to be a sensitive and narrow band antenna with low impedance.  This can be improved with the following suggestions:
  • A folded dipole will increase the impedance to between 50 and 75 Ohm.
  • A folded dipole needs to be a little shorter than a regular dipole and may end up the same size or a little shorter than the first director.
  • The bandwidth can be increased by placing the first director very close, about 0.05 wavelength to the radiator.
  • The antenna can be tuned the old fashioned way: With pliers! - by bending the ends (10%) of the rods.

900 MHz Yagi - Smith Chart

Tuning a Yagi is an art, not a science!

In general, one designs an antenna for the top of the band (930 MHz) and then it will end up lower down towards the middle of the band, due to parasitic effects from the boom, the coaxial cable and things around it.

Tweaking the antenna is quite tricky and requires some patience, but it can be a lot of fun:
  • Do not change the spacing.  You can mount the rods securely.
  • Increasing the length of the dipole, decreases the frequency and vice versa.
  • Make the dipole in sections, so that you can solder and resolder it, till it is tuned exactly to the desired frequency.
  • Bending the ends of the reflector forward, increases the forward gain and reduces the impedance.
  • Bending the ends of the directors backwards, increases the bandwidth and lowers the centre frequency.
  • Bending the rod ends slightly inwards is very important in my experience, since it makes the design much less sensitive to its surroundings, so it will not be detuned so easily by things next to it, but it may reduce the gain a little bit if you go extreme.
Note that since Lambda = 1/(2.pi.f), if your frequency is low by 1%, then you need to trim the length of the elements by 2%, or trim 1% off at each end of the element.  Since the design should not be very far off (unless you used a really dreadful design tool) and the directors will be bent later, only trim the dipole.

I made two.  The one ended up at 913 MHz and the other at 916 MHz and both covered the whole band.  Pretty good.

The measured impedance of this little Yagi is 53 Ohm to 92 Ohm, meaning that one can use a garden variety RG59 or RG58 co-axial cable to drive it directly and avoid using a power sapping trans-match.

If you feel that the impedance is too high for RG58, then you can make a somewhat unconventional dipole with only one folded leg, which is inherently unbalanced and therefore a better match for a coaxial cable.

How to measure the gain of an antenna by pulling yourself up by your boot straps, starting from first principles:
Make two simple dipole antennas - two pieces of wire and a toroid balun each.  Measure the power received over 1 meter distance between them.  Replace one antenna with your antenna under test and measure again.  The difference is the gain of the antenna in dBd (dB relative to a dipole).  For dBi, add 2.2 dB, the gain of a dipole.  Once you have characterized one directional antenna, you can then use that one for measurements of other antennas.

La voila!



Popular posts from this blog

Parasitic Quadrifilar Helical Antenna

This article was reprinted in OSCAR News, March 2018: If you want to receive Satellite Weather Pictures , then you need a decent antenna, otherwise you will receive more noise than picture. For polar orbit satellites, one needs an antenna with a mushroom shaped radiation pattern .  It needs to have strong gain towards the horizon where the satellites are distant, less gain upwards where they are close and as little as possible downwards, which would be wasted and a source of noise.  Most satellites are spin stabilized and therefore the antenna also needs circular polarization, otherwise the received signal will flutter as the antennas rotate through nulls. The helical antenna, first proposed by Kraus in 1948, is the natural solution to circular polarized satellite communications.  It is a simple twisted wire - there seems to be nothing to it.  Various papers have been published on helix antennas, so the operation is pretty well understood. Therefore,

Weather Satellite Turnstile Antennas for the 2 meter Band

NEC2, 2 m band, 146 MHz, Yagi Turnstile Simulation and Build This article describes a Turnstile Antenna for the 2 meter band, 146 MHz amateur satcom, 137 MHz NOAA and Russian Meteor weather satellites.  Weather satellite reception is described here .  A quadrifilar helical antenna is described here .   Engineering, is the art of making what you need,  from what you can get. Radiation Pattern of the Three Element Yagi-Uda Antenna Once one combine and cross two Yagis, the pattern becomes distinctly twisted. The right hand polarization actually becomes visible in the radiation pattern plot, which I found really cool. Radiation Pattern of Six Element Turnstile Antenna Only a true RF Geek can appreciate the twisted invisible inner beauty of a herring bone antenna... Six Element Turnstile Antenna Essentially, it is three crosses on a stick.  The driven elements are broken in the middle at the drive points.  The other elements can go straight throug

To C or not to C, That is the Question

As most would know, the Kernighan and Ritchie C Programming Language is an improved version of B, which is a simplified version of BCPL, which is derived from ALGOL, which is the Ur computer language that started the whole madness, when Adam needed an operating system for his Abacus, to count Eve's apples in the garden of Eden in Iraq.  The result is that C is my favourite, most hated computer language , which I use for everything. At university, I learned FORTRAN with punch cards on a Sperry-Univac, in order to run SPICE, to simulate an operational amplifier.  Computers rapidly lost their glamour after that era! Nobody taught me C.  I bought the book and figured it out myself. Over time, I wrote a couple of assemblers, a linker-locator, various low level debuggers and schedulers and I even fixed a bug in a C compiler - not because I wanted to, but because I had to, to get the job done!   Much of my software work was down in the weeds with DSP and radio modems ( Synchronization,